HD
Docket No. NR10O577-14
da wenryearvy 4O1b
From:
To: Secretary of the Navy
5;
REVIEW OF NAVAL RECORD
Chairman, Board for Correction of Naval Records
Ref: (a) 10 U.S.C. 1552
Encl: (1) DD Form 149 dtd 31 Jul 14 w/attachments
(2) PERS-32 memo dtd 28 Jan 15
1. Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject,
hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this
Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be
corrected by removing the enlisted performance evaluation report for
17 March to 23 May 2005 (copy at Tab A).
2. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Po
reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on
12 February 2015, and pursuant to its regulations, detezminec that
rective action indicated below should be taken on the
the corr
available evidence of record. Documentary material considered by
the Board consisted of the enclosures and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies.
3. The Board, having reviewed all the facts of record pertaining
to Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice, finds as follows:
Board, Petitioner exhausted all
a. Before applying to this
isting law and regulations
administrative remedies available under ex
within the Department of the Navy.
b. In enclosure (2), the. Navy Personnel Command (NPC) office
with cognizance over the subject matter of Petitioner's case has
commented to the effect the request has merit and warrants favorable
action.
CONCLUSION:
Upon review and consideration of all the evidence of record, and
especially in light of enclosure (2), the Board finds the existence
of an error warranting the following corrective action.
RECOMMENDATION:
a. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by removing the
following enlisted performance evaluation report and related
material:
Period of Report
From To
Date of Report Reporting Senior
30 Nov 05 17 Max 05 23 May 05
b. That NO memorandum be filed in place of the removed report,
as the beginning date of the report for 16 March to 15 November 2005
can be changed to 17 March 2005 to maintain continuity.
c. That appropriate corrections be made to the magnetic tape
or microfilm maintained by NPC.
d. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating
to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely
expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or
material be added to the record in the future.
4. Pursuant to Section 6(c) of the revised Procedures of the Board
for Correction of Naval Records (32 Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 723.6(c)) it is certified that a quorum was present at the
Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true
and complete record of the Board’s proceedings in the above entitled
matter.
JONATHAN S. RUSKIN
Recorder
5. Pursuant to the delegation of authority set out in Section 6 (e)
of the revised Procedures of the Board for Correction of Naval Records
(32 Code of Federal Regulations, Section 723.6(e)) and having assured
compliance with its provisions, it is hereby announced that the
— ae re 8
foregoing corrective action
taken under the authority of reference
(a), has been approved by the Board on behalf of the Secretary of
the Navy.
(
ROBERT J. O’ NEILL
Executive Director
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR933-13
The Board, consisting of Ms. Lapinski and Messrs. Dikeman and McBride, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 7 March 2013, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. f. In enclosure (6), PERS-32, the NPC office with cognizance over performance evaluations, commented to the effect that in light of enclosures (4) and (5), Petitioner’s performance evaluation record should be...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 05995-08
The Board, consisting of Ms. Humphrey and Messrs. W. Hicks and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 14 August 2008, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. c. That any material or entries inconsistent with or relating to the Board's recommendation be corrected, removed or completely expunged from Petitioner's record and that no such entries or material be added...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 00167-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the enlisted performance evaluation report for 16 March to 1 October 2005, a copy of which is at Tab A, leaving in his record the report for 16 March to 4 October 2005, a copy of which is at Tab B. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Grover, McBride and Sproul, reviewed Petitioner's...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 00167-10
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the enlisted performance evaluation report for 16 March to 1 October 2005, a copy of which is at Tab A, leaving in his record the report for 16 March to 4 October 2005, a copy of which is at Tab B. The Board, consisting of Messrs. Grover, McBride and Sproul, reviewed Petitioner's...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 04739-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a) , Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting that his naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) counseling entry dated 24 February 2005, and by implication, his rebuttal statement dated 2 March 2005, copies of which are in enclosure (1) at Tab A.2. The Board, consisting of Ms. Davies and Messrs. Boyd and Schultz, reviewed Petitioner’s...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 02179-05
Pursuant to the provisions of reference (a), Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that his naval record be corrected by promoting him to major in the Marine Corps Reserve with a date of rank and effective date to reflect selection by the Fiscal Year (FY) 2005 Reserve Major Selection Board, which is 1 July 2004. The Board, consisting of Ms. Davies and Messrs. Boyd and Schultz, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2686 14
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hedrick, Marquez and Sproul, reviewed Petitioner's allegations of error and injustice on 29 October 2014, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. d. In enclosure (4), PERS-32, the NPC office with cognizance over fitness reports, has commented to the effect that both contested fitness reports should be removed. That Petitioner's naval record be corrected by...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 06852-12
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 5. Pursuant to the provisions of reference {a}, Subject, hereinafter referred to as Petitioner, filed enclosure (1) with this Board requesting, in effect, that the applicable naval record be corrected by removing the service record page 11 (“Administrative Remarks (1070)”) entry 8 February 2005, the page 11 entry dated 4/7/05 regarding violation of Article 128 (Uniform Code of Military Justice), and the page lla entry...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 02398-06
The Board, consisting of Messrs. Hess, Lippolis and Swarens, reviewed Petitioner’s allegations of error and injustice on 14 September 2006, and pursuant to its regulations, determined that the corrective action indicated below should be taken on the available evidence of record. In correspondence attached as enclosure (2), the Navy Personnel Command (NPC) office having cognizance over the subject matter addressed in Petitioner’s application has commented to the effect that his request has...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 00212-05
The member requests the removal of his fitness report for the period 1 November 2003 to 13 August 2004.2. d. The reporting senior is charged with commenting on the performance or characteristics of each member under his/her command and determines what material will be included in a fitness report. Each fitness report represents the judgment of the reporting senior during a particular reporting period.